| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
J Korean Soc Emerg Med > Volume 20(6); 2009 > Article
Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2009;20(6): 689-696.
The Efficacy of a Critical Event Monitoring System for Critical Care
Jae Hyug Woo, Yong Su Lim, Jae Kwang Kim, Jin Joo Kim, Sung Youl Hyun, Hyuk Jun Yang, Gun Lee, Mi Jin Lee
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University of Gil Hospital, Incheon, Korea. yongem@gilhospital.com
2Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University1, Daejeon, Korea.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study evaluated the efficacy and positive influences of a critical event monitoring system (CEMS), which is an automatic alerting system for patients with critical laboratory results.
METHODS:
We compared various patient data variables with hyperkalemia during the 1 year before and after CEMS, which was initiated in July 2007 (Before group: July 2006~June 2007, After group: July 2007~June 2008).
RESULTS:
A total of 2,417 patients had severe hyperkalemia (K+> or =6.5 mmol/L) during the period. Of the 2,417, 1680 were excluded, Leaving 389 patients to be enrolled in the 'before group' and 348 in the 'after group'. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Although the load of work for the medical staff increased during the period when CEMS was begun, the time interval from critical laboratory results to appropriate treatment decreased (72.68+/-94.03 vs. 70.07+/-92.28 minutes) as did the length of hospital stays (20.27+/-27.01 vs. 17.03+/-26.89 days). These decreases were not statistically significant. Decreases in time interval and hospital stay were more prominent for patients treated in the ICU and by emergency physicians during the day time. Mortality within 48 hours (19.5 vs. 19.5%) did not change after beginning CEMS. Mortality in the ICU (2.04 vs. 1.94%, p=0.046) decreased after beginning CEMS.
CONCLUSION:
Information technology strategies such as using CEMS may be an effective tool for improving the quality of medical care. But we must also consider other factors such as work load of the medical staff which also influence the quality of medical care.
Key words: Quality of health care, Clinical laboratory information systems, Critical care
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
1,285
View
6
Download
Related articles
Validation of a Monitoring System for CPR Quality in a Manikin Model  2009 December;20(6)
The Efficacy of Rectal Thiopental According to the Enema Positions for Pediatric Sedation  2010 February;21(1)
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
TEL: +82-62-226-1780   FAX: +82-62-224-3501   E-mail: dlskdud416@naver.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI