| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
J Korean Soc Emerg Med > Volume 36(2); 2025 > Article
Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2025;36(2): 54-62.
비ST분절상승 심근경색 환자에서의 침습적 시술의 시기에 따른 합병증 발생 비교
서창완1 , 박하영1 , 김한별1 , 고재욱2 , 이준배2 , 황윤정2 , 황태식2
1인제대학교 의과대학 해운대백병원 응급의학과
2연세대학교 의과대학 용인세브란스병원 응급의학과
Comparison of complications in patients with NSTEMI according to the timing of invasive intervention: early versus delayed
Chang Wan Seo1 , Ha Young Park1 , Han Byeol Kim1 , Jai Woog Ko2 , Jun Bae Lee2 , Yoon Jung Hwang2 , Tae Sik Hwang2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
Correspondence  Tae Sik Hwang ,Tel: 031-5189-8985, Fax: 031-5189-8018, Email: emhwang1@hanmaill.net,
Received: October 20, 2023; Revised: November 5, 2023   Accepted: November 6, 2023.  Published online: April 30, 2025.
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Acute coronary syndrome often requires urgent intervention. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend invasive procedures within 24 hours for high-risk cases. Nevertheless, there have been limited studies on non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in South Korea. This study compared the risk of complications based on the timing of intervention.
Method:
A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients with chest pain and elevated high-sensitivity troponin T from January to December 2021 in the emergency department. Patients were categorized into early (≤24 hr) and late (>24 hr) intervention groups. Primary outcomes (death, restenosis, or stroke) at 12 months were compared. Survival and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the factors affecting the outcomes in the two groups.
Results:
Three hundred seventy six patients were enrolled in the study, and 115 patients were excluded. Among 261 patients, 106 and 155 patients were in the early intervention group (≤24 hr), and late intervention group (>24 hr), respectively. The primary outcome (death or restenosis) showed no significant difference (hazard ratio [HR] in the early intervention group at 12 mo; 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.70; P=0.905). However, risk of stroke was lower in the early intervention group (HR in the early, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.66; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis showed no significant advantage for early intervention.
Conclusion:
In NSTEMI patients, early intervention does not reduce death or restenosis but lowers stroke incidence. No specific risk factors favored early intervention.
Key words: Acute coronary syndrome; Non-ST elevated myocardial infarction; Coronary angiography; Time factors; Complications
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
41
View
11
Download
Related article
Comparison of clinical features of anaphylaxis patients according to epinephrine administration  2023 December;34(6)
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
TEL: +82-2-3676-1333   FAX: +82-2-3676-1339   E-mail: office@emergency.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI