|
Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2016;27(5 Suppl.): 53-60. |
응급의학과 수련 만족도에 대한 분석과 향후 교육 수련 발전 방향에 대한 제안 |
박송이23, 김인병1, 양혁준2, 이기중3, 임태호4, 한승백5, 강구현6, 강영준7, 김주영8, 김철9, 박경혜23, 박유석10, 박주옥11, 박준범12, 박준석13, 박현경14, 손재돈15, 오세현16, 오영민17, 이동욱18, 이형민5, 정시영1, 정진우19, 조광현20, 조영순21, 조한진8, 최대해22 |
1명지병원 응급의학과 2가천대학교길병원 응급의학과 3포항세명기독병원 4한양대학교병원 응급의학과 5인하대학교병원 응급의학과 6한림대학교 강남성심병원 응급의학과 7제주대학교병원 응급의학과 8고려대학교 안산병원 응급의학과 9아산충무병원 응급의학과 10연세대학교 세브란스병원 응급의학과 11한림대학교 동탄성심병원 응급의학과 12순천향대학교병원 응급의학과 13인제대학교 일산백병원 응급의학과 14강동경희대병원 응급의학과 15국군수도병원 16강릉아산병원 응급의학과 17의정부성모병원 응급의학과 18순천향대학교 천안병원 응급의학과 19동아대학교병원 응급의학과 20을지병원 응급의학과 21순천향대학교 부천병원 응급의학과 22동국대학교 경주병원 응급의학과 23해운대 백병원 응급의학과 |
Satisfaction Survey of Emergency Medicine Residency Training for Emergency Medicine Specialist and Suggestion for Improvement on the Future Emergency Medicine Residency Training |
Song Yi Park23, Inbyung Kim1, Hyukjun Yang2, Kijung Lee3, Taeho Im4, Seungbaik Han5, Kuhyun Kang6, Youngjun Kang7, Jooyeong Kim8, Chul Kim9, Kyung Hye Park23, Yooseok Park10, Juok Park11, Junbeom Park12, Junseok Park13, Hyunkyung Park14, Jaedon Son15, Sehyun Oh16, Youngmin Oh17, Dongwook Lee18, Hyungmin Lee5, Siyoung Jung1, Jinwoo Jeong19, Kwanghyun Cho20, Yeongsun Cho21, Hanjin Cho8, Daihai Choi22 |
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Korea 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Korea 3Pohang Semyong Gidok Hospital, Korea 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Korea 5Department of Emergency Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Korea 6Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallim University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Korea 7Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju University Hospital, Korea 8Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea 9Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Chungmu Hospital, Korea 10Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Korea 11Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallim University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Korea 12Department of Emergency Medicine, Soon Chon Hyang University Hospital Seoul, Korea 13Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Korea 14Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Korea 15The Armed Forces Medical Command, Korea 16Department of Emergency Medicine, GangNeung Asan Hospital, Korea 17Department of Emergency Medicine, Catholic University Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Korea 18Department of Emergency Medicine, Soon Chon Hyang University Hospital Cheonan, Korea 19Department of Emergency Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Korea 20Department of Emergency Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Korea 21Department of Emergency Medicine, Soon Chon Hyang University Hospital Bucheon, Korea 22Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Korea 23Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Korea |
Correspondence |
Kyung Hye Park ,Tel: 051) 797-0172, Fax: 051) 797-0034, Email: erdoc74@gmail.com,
|
|
Received: April 3, 2016; Revised: May 3, 2016 Accepted: June 16, 2016. Published online: October 30, 2016. |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
Purpose: At 1990, the first emergency medicine residency training was started in Korea. However, there was no date and discussion about the satisfaction of emergency medicine residency training and improvement point. The aim of this study is to investigate the satisfaction of emergency medicine residency training and suggest for improvement on the future emergency medicine residency training.
Method: A nationwide survey was conducted with a representative sample of 432 emergency medicine specialist involved in emergency care in 2015.
Results: The average score of satisfaction for emergency medicine residency training was 3.29±1.09. The most satisfied part was about procedure skills as 3.70±0.99, and the most needed part for future residency training was about communication skill as 4.27±0.77. Satisfaction gap among each training hospitals was significant. Emergency physicians in training hospital considered that patient management and administration, communication skills, prehospital emergency medical service system, educational methods, and research are important in this order. On the other hand. Emergency physicians in non-training hospital considered that medical knowledge, procedure skills, professionalism, and resource utilization are more important. However there was no difference in recommendation between clinical practitioners and non-clinical practitioner.
Conclusion: Korean emergency physicians are satisfied with residency training in procedure skills, patient management and administration, and professionalism and highly recommended them. Communication skill is most highly recommended, but show low satisfaction. Developing the advanced competency assessment for specialist board can lead to residency curriculum change. Furthermore, the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine needs to provide standardized and systematic residency curriculum in order to minimize the disparity between the training hospitals. |
Key words:
Emergency Medicine, Internship and residency, Personal satisfaction, Republic of Korea, Survey and questionnaires |
|
|
|